Which technical strategy performed best for GEV?
EMA crossover produced the highest total return among the seven tested technical strategies: +352.1% from 2024-04-03 through 2026-09-01, using 0.10% commission and 0.05% slippage.
Seven mechanical technical strategies versus buy and hold, all using the same adjusted daily price history and starting capital.
Change any assumption to update the comparison instantly. Select a strategy for detailed metrics; move across the chart for date-by-date values.
Left axis: $10,000 strategy portfoliosRight axis: adjusted stock price
✓Loaded 606 daily bars
✓Selected 10Y period · 2024-04-03 to 2026-09-01
✓Applied 0.10% commission and 0.05% slippage
✓Simulated orders without look-ahead
✓Calculated risk and return metrics
→GEV · SMA crossover · DAILY RESULTS
Answers use the default ten-year assumptions shown above. Change the controls to explore other scenarios.
EMA crossover produced the highest total return among the seven tested technical strategies: +352.1% from 2024-04-03 through 2026-09-01, using 0.10% commission and 0.05% slippage.
No in this historical simulation. EMA crossover trailed buy and hold by 253.8 percentage points. Buy and hold returned +605.9% over the same dates.
SMA crossover had the smallest maximum drawdown at 0.0%. Maximum drawdown is the largest decline from a prior portfolio peak during the test.
For EMA crossover, moving from no modeled costs to 0.25% commission plus 0.10% slippage reduced the ten-year total return by 9.5 percentage points.
It uses 606 adjusted daily bars for GE Vernova, from 2024-04-03 through 2026-09-01. Signals are executed on the following bar to avoid look-ahead bias.